South Korean investigators abandon effort to detain impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol

May be an image of 1 person and crowd
Police vehicles were seen outside of Yoon’s residence in Seoul.

“We plan to decide on the next steps following a review,” the CIO added. “We express serious regret over the behavior of the suspect who refused to comply with legally set procedures,” it added.

Yoon’s side described the detention attempt as “an invalid and illegal warrant and strongly regrettable.”

Kwon Young-Se, the interim leader of Yoon’s ruling conservative People Power Party, accused the CIO of unfair, under-the-table dealing with the judge that issued the warrant.

“This is an unfair transaction” secured “through judge shopping,” Kwon told reporters Friday, referring to the fact that the CIO applied for the warrant not at the respective judicial department but rather at a non-related court and to a left-leaning judge, who noted in the warrant that the police could essentially raid a national security facility.

“I can’t help but feel terrible about the disappearance of the rule of law in the Republic of Korea,” Kwon added.

Over 1,000 Yoon supporters remained at the scene waving Korean and American flags after CIO investigators left. Many were holding “Stop the Steal” cardboard signs.

His supporters believe Yoon’s assertion that that the opposition is attempting to steal the presidency, that the opposition leader — who has already been charged in multiple criminal cases — should be arrested first, that the previous election was rigged — which Yoon also insisted when attempting to implement martial law — and that North Korea-backed left-leaning forces in South Korean society are trying to topple the government.

 Under South Korea’s constitution, if a sitting president is accused of insurrection, the police have the authority to arrest him while he is still in office.

A joint investigation team sought the warrant on insurrection and abuse of power charges after they said Yoon ignored three summonses to appear for questioning.

The court’s decision to grant the warrant marks the first for a president in the country’s history.

Immediately after the request, Yoon’s attorneys asked the court to dismiss it, claiming that the headquarters “does not have the authority to investigate an insurrection” and that declaring martial law was constitutional.

Yoon declared martial law in a televised speech on Dec. 3. The president said the measure was necessary due to the actions of the country’s liberal opposition, the Democratic Party, which he accused of controlling parliament, sympathizing with North Korea and paralyzing the government.